The #ReimagineFORUM @ Discipleship.Network

Equipping Your Reimagine Journey

Views: 24

Comment

You need to be a member of The #ReimagineFORUM @ Discipleship.Network to add comments!

Join The #ReimagineFORUM @ Discipleship.Network

Comment by Phil Miglioratti on September 19, 2020 at 2:58pm

Matt Tully 

One of the things you've already hit on, but it's really key to what you're trying to do in this new book, is to focus not just on the individual pastor or the individual leader—those are often the things that make the news, obviously—but you really want to broaden the conversation to focus also on the team surrounding that person—the team within the church. Can you unpack that a little bit? Why do you feel like that's something that we have been so prone to maybe ignore or downplay?

Paul David Tripp
Let me start by giving you what I think is the summary thesis of the book. It's this: The key to ministry fruitfulness is longevity. Fruit doesn't happen overnight. The key to longevity is spiritual health. If you're not spiritually healthy, the push and pull and struggle and suffering and criticism and hardship of ministry will burn you out and you'll leave. So, the key to fruitfulness is longevity. The key to longevity is spiritual health. Now here's the kicker of the book: The key to spiritual health is gospel community. There's no evidence in the New Testament for this individualized, self-sufficient, Jesus-and-me Christianity that has become way too much the norm in evangelicalism. You could not read the New Testament without concluding that our faith is deeply relational. First, a dependent relationship with God; and secondly, an interdependent relationship with one another. Secondly, there's no indication anywhere in the New Testament that it's safe for a pastor to live up above or outside of that gospel community. So I would propose that our fundamental model of leadership is, in many places, defective because we're looking for sort of an independently capable, self-starting, strong personality leader. I would argue that's a recipe for disaster. Think about this—the inertia of grace is not from dependence to independence. The inertia of grace is from independence to dependence. The more mature you are, the more godly you are, the more holiness is your goal, the more dependent you are because that's what you're created for. So what we've actually ended up producing then are arrogant, self-focused bullies. How many more experiences are we going to have to hear of people who feel bullied by Christian leaders? That itself is a scandal. We've got to look back and say, What is the missing ingredient in this definition? I would argue it's humble, Christ-centered, grace-driven, redemptive community. And I want to know, if we're seeking to call a pastor to a church, whether or not he's a man who is humbly committed to be part of that kind of community. I want to say one other thing. We've tended to look for leaders who are good planners, strategizers, and vision casters. I would not say that those things are unimportant, but if you look at the qualifications for elder—this is radical—other than the ability to teach, they're all character qualities. Now, it appears that God is saying leadership capability—leadership fruitfulness—is all character-driven. So we've tended to weight things toward giftedness and not toward character.

Complete interview (text and audio)>>>

Comment by Phil Miglioratti on September 12, 2020 at 5:41pm
Comment by Network Creator / Coordinator on June 15, 2020 at 11:24am

Why Knowledge is a Thing of the Past

Excerpted with permission of the author from Chapter Six of The Coach Model for Christian Leaders by Keith E. Webb.

As leaders, we often view ourselves as knowledge providers. So we teach, tell, or advise and, in this way, pass on our knowledge to someone else. The instruction process requires the other person to listen as we share our knowledge. The assumption is that what we have to say will be the key to solving the other person’s problem, or will help them achieve their goal.

This is sometimes helpful, but knowledge, even the knowledge that worked for us in the past, isn’t as powerful as generating insight in the other person. We own what we discover.

Don’t get me wrong, I love studying what’s already been said and done on a topic. That information is invaluable. However, it is only one type of learning. I believe there is deeper learning that goes beyond existing knowledge and how others have applied it. Deeper learning actually creates new ideas, applications and actions that neither the coach nor the coachee were aware of before.

Creating something new requires engaged and reflective thinking. This is where powerful questions come in. Asking the right questions promotes reflection more effectively than merely providing knowledge. Coaches use questions as a primary tool in working with others. Questions help stimulate thinking, broaden perspective, and generate new options for actions.

Let’s look at the difference between knowledge and questions:

Knowledge is past; Questions are future.

Knowledge is static; Questions are dynamic.

Knowledge is rigid; Questions are flexible.

Knowledge limits options; Questions create possibilities.

Knowledge requires adaptation; Questions call for innovation.

Knowledge is a location; Questions are a journey.

Knowledge can be superior; Questions require humility.

Knowledge knows; Questions learn.

Note from Bob:  So what do you want to be when you grow up: a Know-It-All Leader or an Always Asking Leader?

Copyright © 2020 Leading With Questions, All rights reserved.

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Make disciples

Who Make Disciples

Who Love God

&

Love Neighbors >>>

© 2020   Created by Network Creator / Coordinator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service